Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3364 13
Original file (NR3364 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
TAL
Docket No: 3364-13
24 November 2014

your application

ror wena ection of your
the provis sions t Ny

= 10 of the United

 

Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the
the statute of

Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the st t
Limitations and consider your application on its merits.
three-member panel of the Board fo

or Correction of Naval Records ,
sitting in executive session, considered your application on
5 November 2014. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request. your allegati ions of error and
rative

injustice were reviewed in accoraance with administ
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedin nos of this

Board. Documentary material considered by the Board

your application, together with a-- material submitte
' 

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR621 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR621 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2015 . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and pclicies. After applying these guidelines to the evidence in the case, the Board was not able to substantiate the existence o= PTSD in your case .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR429 14

    Original file (NR429 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. directed your commanding officer to issue you an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct, and on 17 August 2009, you were so discharged.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1805 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR1805 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A chree-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 201~ . Documentary material co~sidered by the Board consisted o: your application, together with a:l material submitted in support thereo:, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regula~ions, and po_icies. During this period of UA, May 1991, you were declared a deserter.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2238-13

    Original file (NR2238-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board Records, sitting in executive sess application on 11 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3171 14

    Original file (NR3171 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 2 December 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrati regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of t Board. Your commanding officer then recommended you for administrative separation with an other than honorable (OTH) characterization of service discharge due to misconduct (drug abuse - use).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6427 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR6427 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together ae ele EL material submitted in support thereof, your husband’s naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and polici s BR three-member panel of the Board for Correc e sessi at ] After careful and conscie 1 entire record, the Board found t evi e cl Ss insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice Your ‘husband enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3141-13

    Original file (NR3141-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701-5, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 - ARLINGTON, VA 22204-24906 : TIR

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2593 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR2593 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. Documentary material considered by O ed of your application, together with all mater: pport ther naval record, and applicable ions, After and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice You enlisted in the Navy and began...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2777 14

    Original file (NR2777 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your record of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04170-07

    Original file (04170-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 24 April 1989 at age 34. Your commanding officer concurred with the ADB...